EGEGazette
Live
Iran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbaseHouthi forces push for strategic high ground in Yemen as more residents fleeVessel Struck in Strait of Hormuz Following Iranian Guard Threats, Two Lightly InjuredIran Says It Shot Down US Drone Over Strait of Hormuz
politicsReported

DOJ Defends Trump Administration Ban on CNN, Politico and MS Now From White House Access

The department argues in a court filing that White House access is a 'privilege, not a right,' as the outlets sue over the restriction.

· 1 min read · language: en

The US Department of Justice has defended President Donald Trump's decision to bar CNN, Politico and MS Now from the White House grounds, in a court filing responding to a lawsuit from the news organizations, according to the Guardian.

Government lawyers argued that access to the White House is "a privilege, not a right," and cited national security concerns in defending the administration's decision to restrict the outlets' access.

The filing also reiterated the administration's characterization of coverage from the three organizations as "fake news," with lawyers arguing that the access ban does not violate the First Amendment given the privilege-based framing of White House credentials.

CNN, Politico and MS Now filed suit against the administration over the ban, arguing the restriction infringes on press freedoms protected under the Constitution, setting up a legal dispute over the boundaries of executive authority to control media access.

The Guardian's report did not specify a timeline for when a court might rule on the matter or detail further arguments expected from either side as the case proceeds.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: AR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…