EGEGazette
Live
Iran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbaseHouthi forces push for strategic high ground in Yemen as more residents fleeVessel Struck in Strait of Hormuz Following Iranian Guard Threats, Two Lightly InjuredIran Says It Shot Down US Drone Over Strait of Hormuz
politicsReported

Trump Lawyers Argue White House Access Is 'a Privilege, Not a Right' Ahead of Court Hearing

Attorneys for President Trump are defending the administration's decision to bar several news outlets from White House grounds, as CNN, Politico and MS Now prepare to make their case in court.

· 1 min read · language: en

Lawyers for President Donald Trump are defending the administration's move to ban certain journalists from the White House, arguing that access to the grounds is "a privilege, not a right," according to a report from The Guardian.

The legal argument comes ahead of a court hearing in which news outlets CNN, Politico and MS Now are expected to present their case after being banned from White House grounds by the president.

Outlets Push Back in Court

The affected outlets are contesting the ban through the court system, though the report does not detail the specific legal claims they are making or the court in which the hearing is taking place.

The dispute centers on press access to the White House, an issue that has drawn attention from media organizations concerned about precedent for government control over which outlets can cover the presidency from its grounds.

Further details on the timeline of the ban, the specific incidents that prompted it, and the court's eventual ruling were not included in the available source material.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: AR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…