EGEGazette
Live
Iran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbaseHouthi forces push for strategic high ground in Yemen as more residents fleeVessel Struck in Strait of Hormuz Following Iranian Guard Threats, Two Lightly InjuredIran Says It Shot Down US Drone Over Strait of Hormuz
politicsReported

Justice Department Defends White House Press Ban Ahead of Court Hearing

The US Justice Department argues that White House access is 'a privilege, not a right' as CNN, Politico and MS Now prepare to make their case in court after being barred from White House grounds.

· 1 min read · language: en

The US Justice Department is defending the Trump administration's decision to bar several news outlets from White House grounds, arguing ahead of a court hearing that access to the White House is "a privilege, not a right."

The case centers on outlets including CNN, Politico and MS Now, which were banned from White House premises and are now preparing to present their case in court challenging the decision.

The dispute raises questions about press access to the White House and the extent to which the administration can restrict which outlets are permitted on the grounds, an issue that has drawn attention from press freedom advocates.

The Justice Department's position, framing access as a discretionary privilege rather than a guaranteed right, is expected to be a central point of contention as the affected outlets argue their case before the court.

The outcome of the hearing could have implications for how future administrations manage press access to the White House, a matter that has periodically prompted legal and political disputes between the press corps and the executive branch.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: AR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…