EGEGazette
Live
Harvey Weinstein Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 2006 Sexual AssaultHacking Group ShinyHunters Claims Major Breach Targeting FBI DataIran Won't Resume US Talks or Reopen Hormuz Until Washington Meets Its Terms, Official SaysIran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbase
politicsReported

Federal judge delays ruling on White House press access ban for CNN, Politico, MS NOW

A lawyer for the outlets disputed the administration’s national-security rationale during a roughly 45-minute hearing.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
BBC News — World

A federal judge has delayed ruling on a challenge to the White House’s decision to restrict media access for CNN, Politico and MS NOW, following a hearing that lasted roughly 45 minutes.

During the hearing, a lawyer representing the three outlets disputed arguments from the Trump administration that the access ban was necessary for national security reasons, pushing back on the government’s justification for the restriction.

The judge did not indicate when a ruling would be issued, leaving the outlets’ access status unresolved for now. The case is being watched closely as a test of how courts weigh press-access disputes against government claims of security concerns.

What’s at stake

Restrictions on press access to the White House have drawn scrutiny from press freedom advocates, who argue that broad security justifications should not be used to limit coverage by specific outlets. The administration has maintained that its decision was driven by legitimate security considerations.

Both sides are expected to await the court’s eventual ruling, which could set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled going forward.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…