EGEGazette
Live
Harvey Weinstein Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 2006 Sexual AssaultHacking Group ShinyHunters Claims Major Breach Targeting FBI DataIran Won't Resume US Talks or Reopen Hormuz Until Washington Meets Its Terms, Official SaysIran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbase

Judge Hears Arguments Over Trump Administration's White House Media Ban

A federal judge said she hopes to rule 'soon' after hearing arguments over the exclusion of MS NOW, CNN and Politico from White House press access.

· 2 min read · language: en

A federal judge heard arguments Tuesday over the Trump administration's decision to bar MS NOW, CNN and Politico from White House press access, with the judge indicating she hopes to issue a ruling "soon," according to CNBC.

The Department of Justice defended the ban during the hearing, citing national security concerns as the basis for excluding the three news organizations from the White House press pool and related access. The DOJ's arguments were presented Tuesday night as part of the ongoing legal proceedings over the restrictions.

The case centers on questions of press access and First Amendment protections, with the excluded outlets arguing that the administration's justification for the ban has not been substantiated in a manner that would override longstanding norms of White House press access for major news organizations.

It was not immediately clear from the hearing when the judge would issue her ruling, or what specific relief she might order if she finds in favor of the news organizations challenging the ban.

The dispute is the latest in a series of tensions between the Trump administration and segments of the media over access and coverage, with the outcome of the case likely to have implications for how future administrations handle press credentialing decisions.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…