EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastU.S. Military Announces Four Killed in Strike on Boat in Caribbean4 killed in US military strike on suspected drug-trafficking vessel in Caribbean SeaReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanTrump Cuts Short Camp David Stay Amid Rising Middle East Tensions
technologyReported

CNBC Report Raises Concerns Over Anthropic, OpenAI Plan for AI Risk Evaluators

A CNBC report examines proposals from Anthropic and OpenAI to embed AI systems as evaluators of model risk, noting the approach carries unresolved issues.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
CNBC — Top News

Anthropic and OpenAI have proposed using embedded AI evaluators as a tool to help manage the risk of artificial intelligence models causing catastrophic harm to society, according to a report published by CNBC.

The report describes the proposal as an emerging idea within the AI industry aimed at addressing safety concerns tied to increasingly capable AI systems. Under this approach, AI-based evaluators would be built into models or systems to help assess and flag potential risks before they escalate into significant harm.

However, CNBC's report indicates that the concept faces notable issues that warrant scrutiny. The report does not detail the full scope of these concerns in the available excerpt, but frames the proposal as one that, while intended to bolster safety, may itself introduce new risks or limitations that have not been fully resolved.

Anthropic and OpenAI are among the leading developers of advanced AI models and have both previously emphasized safety research as part of their public messaging on AI development. The companies have not been quoted directly in the available excerpt regarding the specifics of the evaluator proposal.

CNBC's report suggests that the broader AI industry and policymakers may need to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of relying on AI systems themselves to police other AI systems for catastrophic risk, a debate that is likely to continue as companies explore new safety frameworks.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…