EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanFederal Immigration Agent Shoots and Injures Man in Austin, TexasPowerful Explosions Reported in Syria's Aleppo CountrysideSix Pakistani soldiers, including two officers, killed in clash near Afghan border
opinionReported

Pensions: Laurent Pietraszewski argues against targeted under-indexing of benefits

In an op-ed published by Le Monde, the former pensions secretary contends that retirees have no debt to working-age people and warns against certain funding options for the system.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
Le Monde — Une

Laurent Pietraszewski, former lawmaker and ex-secretary of state for pensions, published an op-ed in Le Monde in which he addresses the debate on intergenerational fairness in pension policy.

According to him, contrary to an idea sometimes advanced, retirees do not owe a debt to working-age people. Nevertheless, he invites, in his own words, "settling accounts" between generations since this question is regularly raised in public debate.

Regarding funding options for the pension system, the former secretary of state distinguishes between two measures discussed in public debate. On one hand, capping the 10% tax deduction that benefits retirees could, according to him, constitute a lesser evil for contributing to pension financing.

On the other hand, he contends that targeted under-indexing of pensions, which would involve raising certain benefits by less than inflation, would represent a mistake. He does not elaborate further, in the available excerpts, on the precise reasons justifying this distinction between the two measures.

This op-ed comes as funding for the French pension system continues to be the subject of recurring debate among political actors, social partners, and experts, particularly regarding how the burden is shared between generations.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…