Report: Do the British Museum’s links with Palantir and BP bring it into disrepute? | Letter

The Guardian — Opinion has covered a development concerning “Report: Do the British Museum’s links with Palantir and BP bring it into disrepute? | Letter,” with the available account limited to the facts included in the supplied text.

Dr Chris Garrard responds to an article about George Osborne assuming that Palantir founder Peter Thiel’s visit to view the Bayeux tapestry would remain secret As the chair of the British Museum, George Osborne is a holder of public office with a duty to be transparent. The report also notes that His comment that “it wasn’t like we expected anyone to know” about the billionaire Peter Thiel’s private view of the Bayeux tapestry suggests his loyalties lie more with the founder of Palantir and friend of Jeffrey Epstein over the openness that a national museum should demonstrate ( George Osborne ‘thought Peter Thiel’s Bayeux tapestry visit would be secret’, 19 September ). Osborne then made the claim that the museum would shut down without unethical corporate sponsors such as BP. In fact, just a few weeks ago London’s Science Museum ended its decades-long partnership with BP, joining Tate , the National Portrait Gallery and others. Last year, 91% of members of the Museums Association also ratified a new code of ethics , which states that museums should “Transition away from sponsorship from organisations involved with environmental harm (including fossil fuels), [and] human rights abuses”.

Any statements, estimates or characterisations remain attributed to the people or organisations identified by the source. The excerpt alone does not provide a complete documentary record or necessarily include responses from every party involved.

Official statements or subsequent reporting may add context as the story develops. For now, this account is confined to information directly supported by the provided headline and excerpt.