Opinion: The Question of Englishness and Race Refuses to Go Away, Writes Jason Okundaye
Guardian columnist Jason Okundaye argues that even critics on the right reject an ethnic definition of Englishness, yet the debate persists.
Written by EGazette’s AI. The facts are drawn from cited sources; the analysis is the AI’s own.
In a Guardian opinion column, writer Jason Okundaye examines the recurring political question of whether English national identity can include people who are not white, arguing that the debate keeps resurfacing in British political discourse despite pushback from figures across the political spectrum.
Okundaye's column points to comments from former prime minister Rishi Sunak, who wrote in the Times that national identity should not be reduced to a "DNA test." Sunak, the UK's first prime minister of colour, has previously described being told by a podcaster that he was not English because he is a "brown-skinned Hindu," a claim he characterised as a "reverse Tebbit test" — a reference to the sociological concept originally used to measure the loyalty of immigrants and their children based on which national cricket team they supported.
According to the column, Sunak warned that defining Englishness in purely ethnic terms risks putting the country on a "very slippery slope," distinguishing between English as what some regard as an ethnic identity and British as a civic one, while cautioning that most people may not register that distinction.
Okundaye's piece notes that even a figure such as Jacob Rees-Mogg, generally associated with the political right, has pushed back on defining Englishness in exclusively ethnic terms, which the column presents as evidence that the debate persists even when prominent conservative voices reject the ethnic framing.
The column frames the durability of this discourse as "deeply troubling," suggesting that the recurrence of questions about who counts as authentically English, regardless of formal political consensus against ethnic definitions, points to unresolved tensions in British society around race, belonging and national identity.
The piece is presented as opinion and reflects the views of its author, an assistant Opinion editor at the Guardian.
Sources
- Of course you can be English if you’re not white. So why can’t the right leave the question alone? | Jason Okundaye — The Guardian — Politics
EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.
Related articles
Report: I love a drink in the stands, but Burnham’s beer proposal feels out of step with modern football | Marva Kreel
A report from The Guardian — Politics sets out the main available details, with claims kept attributed to their sources.
Commentary: Simon Jenkins Argues Lib Dems Must Champion Localism to Stay Relevant
In a Guardian column, Simon Jenkins writes that the Liberal Democrats should focus on deeper local democracy to carve out a distinct political identity.
Pierre de Gaulle: West Is Replacing Diplomacy With War and Using the Dollar as a Sanctions Weapon
In comments carried by Russian state news agency TASS, Pierre de Gaulle argued that Western countries are resisting a shift away from the world order they have long dominated.
Opinion: If a Lack of Exercise Harms Our Bodies, What Is Reliance on AI Doing to Our Brains?
Public health professor Devi Sridhar argues that we should not entrust technology companies with the long-term consequences of AI use on human cognition and society.
Hutton and Haldane: Andy Burnham's 'public control' push on utilities is a minefield worth navigating
Writing in the Guardian, Will Hutton and Andy Haldane argue that full nationalisation isn't the only answer for firms like Thames Water, but that they could be run for public benefit.
Reader Responds: Youth Unemployment Requires Macroeconomic Solutions, Not Just Skills Training
A letter to The Guardian argues that increasing government spending, not apprenticeships alone, is needed to address youth unemployment.
Comments
Loading comments…