EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanFederal Immigration Agent Shoots and Injures Man in Austin, TexasPowerful Explosions Reported in Syria's Aleppo CountrysideSix Pakistani soldiers, including two officers, killed in clash near Afghan borderCalls to Withdraw Secret Military Plan in Saxony-Anhalt Amid Fears of Leaks to Russia
opinionReported

Guardian Columnist Warns Russia's Election Offers Cautionary Lesson for Western Democracies

Writing in The Guardian, Rafael Behr argues that Russia's tightly managed elections illustrate tactics of political control that could threaten democratic trust elsewhere, including in Britain.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
The Guardian — Politics

Millions of Russians are set to vote in parliamentary elections this weekend, in a process that Guardian columnist Rafael Behr describes as designed to preserve President Vladimir Putin's authority rather than to determine political outcomes through genuine competition.

According to Behr, the result is effectively settled before polls open: United Russia, the party aligned with Putin, will retain control of the State Duma, the lower house of Russia's parliament. The only uncertainty, he writes, concerns the scale of the ruling party's victory once votes are counted.

Behr notes that a portion of parliamentary seats is reserved for other parties that operate within limits set by the Kremlin, which he characterizes as "systemic parties" that create an appearance of political pluralism without posing a genuine challenge to the ruling establishment. He argues these parties serve two functions: acting as outlets for public discontent, and serving as instruments through which competing factions within Russia's ruling elite can seek to influence Kremlin policy.

In his column, Behr uses the Russian example to raise broader concerns about the erosion of democratic trust and institutions. He suggests that Britain is not immune to similar cynical political tactics, though the specific mechanisms he identifies as threats to British democracy were not detailed in the excerpt available.

The piece forms part of ongoing commentary in Western media about the state of Russian democracy under Putin's leadership, as well as broader debates about the resilience of democratic institutions in established democracies facing political polarization and declining public trust.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…