EGEGazette
Live
Zelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbaseHouthi forces push for strategic high ground in Yemen as more residents fleeVessel Struck in Strait of Hormuz Following Iranian Guard Threats, Two Lightly InjuredIran Says It Shot Down US Drone Over Strait of HormuzIran's Guard Corps Says It Downed Another US Drone Over Strait of HormuzIran says it shot down another US drone over Strait of HormuzRussian Strikes Cut Power in Five Ukrainian Regions, Ukrenergo SaysReport: At least 11 people killed in South Africa township shooting
politicsReported

CNN, MS NOW and Politico to Have Their Day in Court Over Trump White House Ban

The outlets are asking a federal judge to check what they describe as a violation of their constitutional rights after being barred from White House access.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
NPR News

CNN, MS NOW and Politico are set to have their case heard in federal court after asking a judge to intervene over what they describe as a violation of their constitutional rights, following their ban from White House access, according to a report from NPR News.

The outlets argue that the ban stems from President Trump's dissatisfaction with how they cover him, rather than any legitimate security or operational justification.

A test of press access rights

The case is expected to examine the extent to which the White House can restrict access for specific news organizations, and under what circumstances such restrictions might run afoul of constitutional protections for the press.

Legal experts have previously noted that disputes over White House press access raise complex questions balancing executive discretion over credentialing with First Amendment considerations.

The Justice Department has separately defended the administration's position, arguing that coverage by the affected outlets posed risks that justified the restrictions. A ruling on the matter is expected as the case proceeds through the courts.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: AR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…