EGEGazette
Live
China's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbaseHouthi forces push for strategic high ground in Yemen as more residents fleeVessel Struck in Strait of Hormuz Following Iranian Guard Threats, Two Lightly InjuredIran Says It Shot Down US Drone Over Strait of HormuzIran's Guard Corps Says It Downed Another US Drone Over Strait of HormuzIran says it shot down another US drone over Strait of HormuzIsraeli Drone Strike Kills Two Palestinians in Southern Gaza Despite Ceasefire
cultureReported

'Boorman and the Devil' Review: Revisiting the Disaster of 'Exorcist II: The Heretic'

Director John Boorman recounts the making of the widely panned 1977 sequel to 'The Exorcist' in a new documentary account.

· 2 min read · language: en

A new account titled "Boorman and the Devil" offers a detailed retrospective look at the making of "Exorcist II: The Heretic," the 1977 sequel to the hit horror film "The Exorcist," which was widely panned upon release, according to a Guardian review.

The account, by David Kittredge, details filmmaker John Boorman's experience directing the sequel, which the review describes as a "deeply ill-conceived" but ambitious supernatural film that drew ridicule from audiences and critics despite technical innovations, including pioneering use of Steadicam technology.

The sequel brought back Linda Blair and Max von Sydow from the original film, and added Richard Burton as a troubled priest and Louise Fletcher as a psychiatrist, though the review notes the finished film's more unusual elements, including a device meant to allow "mind-reading," were received as unintentionally comedic by audiences.

According to the review, the film's poor reception was severe enough that Boorman recut the film to remove some of its more widely mocked sequences after its initial release, though the changes did not significantly alter its critical standing.

The review characterizes "Boorman and the Devil" as an engaging account of a notorious film production, offering insight into how an ambitious project involving major stars and technical innovation nonetheless became one of the more widely mocked sequels in horror film history.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…