EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanFederal Immigration Agent Shoots and Injures Man in Austin, TexasPowerful Explosions Reported in Syria's Aleppo CountrysideSix Pakistani soldiers, including two officers, killed in clash near Afghan border
politicsReported

Bipartisan Bill Would Tie Highway Funding to Limits on Flock Camera Use

Lawmakers propose restricting license plate-reading cameras made by Flock Safety to a narrow set of public safety purposes, using federal highway funds as leverage, according to a report by Ars Technica.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
Ars Technica

A bipartisan group of lawmakers has introduced legislation that would restrict the use of automated license plate reader cameras made by Flock Safety, according to a report published by Ars Technica.

The bill would limit the cameras to a handful of specified public safety uses, the report said. To enforce compliance, the legislation would threaten to withhold federal highway funding from jurisdictions that do not comply with the proposed restrictions, according to Ars Technica.

Flock Safety's camera systems, which are used by law enforcement agencies and other entities across the United States, capture license plate data that can be used to track vehicle movements. The technology has drawn scrutiny from privacy advocates and some lawmakers concerned about the scope of data collection and how it may be used beyond its stated purposes.

Details about the specific sponsors of the bill, the exact list of permitted public safety uses, and the timeline for potential implementation were not fully specified in the available reporting. Ars Technica indicated the measure reflects a bipartisan effort to place guardrails on the deployment of the camera technology.

The proposal comes amid broader debates in Congress and state legislatures over the use of surveillance technology by law enforcement and the balance between public safety objectives and civil liberties protections. Further details on the bill's provisions and legislative progress were not immediately available.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…