EGEGazette
Live
Zelensky says US has ability to respond strongly after Russian ballistic missile strikes on KyivGlobal Bond Yields Hit Multi-Decade Highs as Treasury, Japanese Debt Sell OffHurricane Polo Threatens Landslides in Mexico as Storm Nolo Approaches HawaiiIranian President Presents Evidence of US Strikes on Civilians at UN AssemblyHarvey Weinstein Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 2006 Sexual AssaultHacking Group ShinyHunters Claims Major Breach Targeting FBI DataIran Won't Resume US Talks or Reopen Hormuz Until Washington Meets Its Terms, Official SaysIran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian Strikes
technologyReported

Are We Back in Big Tech's Move Fast and Break Things Era?

Despite promises to build safe AI, examples of chatbots and automated systems behaving badly are becoming more frequent.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
BBC Technology

A growing number of incidents involving artificial intelligence systems behaving unpredictably or inappropriately has raised questions about whether major technology companies are prioritising speed of deployment over safety, according to a BBC report.

The report notes that despite public commitments from leading AI developers to build safe and reliable systems, examples of AI tools and chatbots producing erroneous, offensive or otherwise problematic outputs have continued to surface at a steady pace.

Industry observers point to the intense competitive pressure among technology firms racing to release new AI products and features as a possible factor behind the recurring issues, echoing an earlier era of Silicon Valley's move fast and break things approach to product development.

Companies developing large-scale AI systems have generally maintained that they invest heavily in safety testing and guardrails before releasing products to the public. Critics, however, argue that the pace of release and the scale of deployment can outstrip the ability of safety teams to catch every failure mode in advance.

The debate over how to balance rapid AI innovation with adequate safety oversight has intensified as generative AI tools become more deeply embedded in consumer products, search engines and workplace software.

Regulators in multiple jurisdictions have signalled growing interest in AI oversight, though comprehensive rules governing AI safety and accountability remain a work in progress in most markets.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…