EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanFederal Immigration Agent Shoots and Injures Man in Austin, TexasPowerful Explosions Reported in Syria's Aleppo CountrysideSix Pakistani soldiers, including two officers, killed in clash near Afghan borderCalls to Withdraw Secret Military Plan in Saxony-Anhalt Amid Fears of Leaks to Russia
politicsReported

US Supreme Court Rejects Trump Bid to Tighten Mail-In Voting Rules

The court's decision leaves existing mail ballot procedures in place as the country heads toward critical midterm elections

· 1 min read · language: en

The United States Supreme Court has rejected an effort by President Donald Trump to impose new restrictions on mail-in voting ahead of the upcoming midterm elections, according to a report by Al Jazeera.

The ruling means that existing rules governing mail-in ballots will remain unchanged as voters prepare to cast ballots in what is being described as a critical midterm contest, Al Jazeera reported.

Details of the specific legal arguments, the vote breakdown among justices, and reactions from the Trump administration or other parties involved were not included in the available report.

Mail-in voting has been a recurring point of contention in recent US elections, with President Trump previously voicing concerns about the practice. This latest attempt to alter mail ballot rules through the courts has now been turned back by the nation's highest court, according to the report.

Further details on the case, including the full text of the court's opinion and any dissenting views, were not immediately available.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…