EGEGazette
Live
Hacking Group ShinyHunters Claims Major Breach Targeting FBI DataIran Won't Resume US Talks or Reopen Hormuz Until Washington Meets Its Terms, Official SaysIran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian StrikesTrump vows to the United Nations to resolve the Iranian file if negotiations failReport: Military aircraft crashes near US air base in Spangdahlem, GermanyReport: Spangdahlem: Military aircraft crashes near US air baseReport: F-16 fighter jet crashes near Spangdahlem US airbase in western Germany — airbaseHouthi forces push for strategic high ground in Yemen as more residents flee
worldOfficialReported

US Declines to Join Anti-Russian Statement on Ukraine at UN

The statement, read by EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrey Sibiga, was not joined by Washington.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
TASS (Russia)

The United States chose not to join a joint statement critical of Russia's actions in Ukraine that was delivered at the United Nations, according to reporting on the proceedings. The statement was read out by European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrey Sibiga.

Joint statements of this kind are typically used by groups of countries at the UN to express a shared position on a given issue, with the list of signatories serving as an indicator of diplomatic alignment. Washington's decision not to add its name to this particular statement was noted as a departure from the position taken by many of its European allies.

The development comes amid continued discussion at the UN General Assembly this week over the war in Ukraine, with various governments using the platform to stake out positions on the conflict and on prospects for a negotiated resolution.

No immediate public explanation for the decision not to join the statement was reported, leaving open questions about how it fits into the broader trajectory of the current US approach to the war.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…