EGEGazette
Live
Report: Hurricane Polo hits Mexico: strong winds and flooding in Baja California SurReport: Russians strike school in Sumy with children sheltering inside — mediaReport: Hurricane Polo makes landfall on Mexico's Pacific coast, heads toward SonoraReport: Red alert in Catalonia: torrential rain floods the Penedès and cuts off metro and roads in BarcelonaIn brief: Myanmar: military air strike on market kills at least 50, humanitarian sources sayReport: Vessel struck by suspected projectile in Strait of HormuzReport: Fire breaks out on vessel hit by projectile in Strait of Hormuz: UK maritime agencyEthiopian Army Announces Control of Alamata Town in Tigray RegionStrong Explosions in Kyiv After Russian Ballistic Missile StrikesIn brief: Ethiopia: fighting intensifies between the TPLF and the federal army in TigrayMyanmar rebels report 49 killed in government troop strikesReport: Ethiopian army clashes with rebel alliance across multiple fronts
AI &Reported

US Cities Push Back on Trump-Era FCC Plan to Preempt Local Broadband Rules

Municipal officials argue that permitting requirements protect communities, saying internet providers are not expanding networks quickly enough on their own.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
— Ars Technica

Cities across the United States are pushing back against a proposal from the Federal Communications Commission that would preempt local rules governing broadband deployment, arguing that permitting requirements serve an important role in protecting communities.

The FCC plan, associated with the Trump administration, would limit the ability of city and local governments to impose permitting and other requirements on internet service providers building out broadband infrastructure. Proponents of such preemption efforts have argued that local rules slow down network expansion and add unnecessary costs for providers.

Cities Defend Local Authority

Municipal officials contesting the plan say permit requirements are necessary safeguards, and argue that internet service providers have not been building out networks quickly enough on their own, even in the absence of local regulatory hurdles. They contend that removing local oversight could leave communities with less say over how infrastructure projects, including construction on public rights-of-way, are managed within city limits.

The dispute reflects a broader, ongoing tension between federal regulators seeking to accelerate broadband expansion nationally and local governments seeking to retain authority over construction and permitting decisions within their jurisdictions. Similar preemption debates have played out in other regulatory areas, including wireless infrastructure siting, in recent years.

It was not immediately clear what specific next steps the FCC plans to take on the proposal, or what timeline city governments expect for a decision. Representatives for the cities involved in opposing the plan have not detailed what alternative measures they might pursue if the FCC moves forward with preemption.

The outcome of the dispute could have implications for how broadband expansion is regulated nationwide, particularly in areas where local governments have used permitting authority to negotiate terms with internet providers.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…

Related articles