EGEGazette
Live
Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Resume Third-Country DeportationsSupreme Court Grants Hold Allowing Trump to Resume Third-Country Deportations Without Legal ChallengeSupreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Resume Third-Country DeportationsConservative Supreme Court Majority Lifts Block on Trump's Third-Country Deportations, Liberal Justices Dissent13-Year-Old Detained After Fatal School Stabbing in SlovakiaReport: Hurricane Polo hits Mexico: strong winds and flooding in Baja California SurRussian Tu-95 Nuclear-Capable Bomber Crashes, Killing SixReport: Russians strike school in Sumy with children sheltering inside — mediaReport: Hurricane Polo makes landfall on Mexico's Pacific coast, heads toward SonoraEstonia Accuses Russia of Ordering Arson Attack on Defence Firm Supplying Ukraine
AI &Reported

US Cities Push Back on Trump-Era FCC Plan to Preempt Local Broadband Rules

Municipal officials argue that permitting requirements protect communities, saying internet providers are not expanding networks quickly enough on their own.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
— Ars Technica

Cities across the United States are pushing back against a proposal from the Federal Communications Commission that would preempt local rules governing broadband deployment, arguing that permitting requirements serve an important role in protecting communities.

The FCC plan, associated with the Trump administration, would limit the ability of city and local governments to impose permitting and other requirements on internet service providers building out broadband infrastructure. Proponents of such preemption efforts have argued that local rules slow down network expansion and add unnecessary costs for providers.

Cities Defend Local Authority

Municipal officials contesting the plan say permit requirements are necessary safeguards, and argue that internet service providers have not been building out networks quickly enough on their own, even in the absence of local regulatory hurdles. They contend that removing local oversight could leave communities with less say over how infrastructure projects, including construction on public rights-of-way, are managed within city limits.

The dispute reflects a broader, ongoing tension between federal regulators seeking to accelerate broadband expansion nationally and local governments seeking to retain authority over construction and permitting decisions within their jurisdictions. Similar preemption debates have played out in other regulatory areas, including wireless infrastructure siting, in recent years.

It was not immediately clear what specific next steps the FCC plans to take on the proposal, or what timeline city governments expect for a decision. Representatives for the cities involved in opposing the plan have not detailed what alternative measures they might pursue if the FCC moves forward with preemption.

The outcome of the dispute could have implications for how broadband expansion is regulated nationwide, particularly in areas where local governments have used permitting authority to negotiate terms with internet providers.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…

Related articles