EGEGazette
Live
Report: Hurricane Polo hits Mexico: strong winds and flooding in Baja California SurReport: Russians strike school in Sumy with children sheltering inside — mediaReport: Hurricane Polo makes landfall on Mexico's Pacific coast, heads toward SonoraReport: Red alert in Catalonia: torrential rain floods the Penedès and cuts off metro and roads in BarcelonaIn brief: Myanmar: military air strike on market kills at least 50, humanitarian sources sayReport: Vessel struck by suspected projectile in Strait of HormuzReport: Fire breaks out on vessel hit by projectile in Strait of Hormuz: UK maritime agencyEthiopian Army Announces Control of Alamata Town in Tigray RegionStrong Explosions in Kyiv After Russian Ballistic Missile StrikesIn brief: Ethiopia: fighting intensifies between the TPLF and the federal army in TigrayMyanmar rebels report 49 killed in government troop strikesReport: Ethiopian army clashes with rebel alliance across multiple fronts
PoliticsReported

Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Reverse Release of Pro-Palestinian Scholar

The U.S. solicitor general has asked the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court's ruling that ordered the release of a Georgetown scholar detained over pro-Palestinian activism.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
— Al Jazeera — All

The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a lower court's decision ordering the release of a Georgetown University scholar who had been detained in connection with pro-Palestinian activism, according to a court filing from the U.S. solicitor general.

The case centers on the detention of the scholar, whose release a lower court ordered after finding issues with the legal basis for holding him. The solicitor general's petition seeks to have that ruling overturned, keeping the case before the courts.

The dispute has drawn attention to broader debates in the United States over the treatment of academics and activists associated with pro-Palestinian advocacy, and over the extent of executive branch authority in immigration and national security-related detentions.

Civil liberties advocates and immigration attorneys have followed the case closely, viewing it as a test of how courts will weigh due process protections against government claims of national security or immigration enforcement authority.

The Supreme Court has not yet indicated whether it will take up the case. Additional proceedings are expected as the legal process continues.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: AR

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…

Related articles