EGEGazette
Live
Xi calls for trust and 'healthy' competition as Trump hosts Chinese leaderZelensky says US has ability to respond strongly after Russian ballistic missile strikes on KyivGlobal Bond Yields Hit Multi-Decade Highs as Treasury, Japanese Debt Sell OffHurricane Polo Threatens Landslides in Mexico as Storm Nolo Approaches HawaiiIranian President Presents Evidence of US Strikes on Civilians at UN AssemblyHarvey Weinstein Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 2006 Sexual AssaultHacking Group ShinyHunters Claims Major Breach Targeting FBI DataIran Won't Resume US Talks or Reopen Hormuz Until Washington Meets Its Terms, Official SaysIran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With Trump
politicsReported

Texas's Highest Criminal Court Upholds Acquittal of Crystal Mason in Voting Case

Crystal Mason, originally sentenced to five years after casting a provisional ballot that was never counted, had fought the conviction for nearly a decade.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
— The Guardian — World

Texas's highest criminal court has upheld the acquittal of Crystal Mason, a Black Texas woman who was sentenced to five years in prison over an illegal voting conviction, according to The Guardian. The Thursday ruling, decided 5-4, brings to a close a case Mason has fought for nearly a decade.

Mason was convicted in 2018 of illegally voting after casting a provisional ballot that ultimately was not counted. She has appealed the conviction since then. In 2024, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals acquitted her in the case, according to The Guardian, and Thursday's ruling by the state's highest criminal court affirmed that outcome.

A case that drew national attention

Mason's prosecution drew significant national attention as an example of a voter facing severe criminal penalties over a ballot that was never actually counted, a pattern voting rights advocates have pointed to when arguing that some illegal-voting prosecutions have disproportionately targeted Black voters. The Guardian's report did not detail the full legal reasoning behind the 5-4 decision or the positions of the dissenting judges.

The Guardian's report did not include a statement from Mason or from the prosecutors who originally brought the case following Thursday's decision.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…