EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanFederal Immigration Agent Shoots and Injures Man in Austin, TexasPowerful Explosions Reported in Syria's Aleppo CountrysideSix Pakistani soldiers, including two officers, killed in clash near Afghan border
politicsReported

Supreme Court Rejects Trump Administration's Bid to Lift Block on Mail-In Ballots Rule

The high court left in place a lower-court order blocking a Postal Service rule, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh warning that enforcing it before the 2026 midterms would be "arbitrary and capricious."

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
CNBC — Top News

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined a request from the Trump administration to lift a lower court's block on a Postal Service rule affecting mail-in ballots, according to a report by CNBC.

The decision leaves in place an existing injunction that had halted enforcement of the rule, CNBC reported.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing in connection with the case, said that applying the Postal Service rule during the 2026 midterm elections "would be arbitrary and capricious," according to CNBC.

The ruling represents a setback for the administration's effort to have the rule enforced ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. CNBC's report did not provide further details on the specific provisions of the rule or the underlying litigation.

The case is part of ongoing legal disputes over mail-in voting procedures as the 2026 midterm elections approach.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…