EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanFederal Immigration Agent Shoots and Injures Man in Austin, TexasPowerful Explosions Reported in Syria's Aleppo CountrysideSix Pakistani soldiers, including two officers, killed in clash near Afghan border
politicsReported

Supreme Court Blocks Trump Order on Mail-In Voting Ahead of Midterms

Election officials from both parties say the ruling averted an administrative disaster, as the president reacted angrily on social media

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
The Guardian — World

The US Supreme Court on Monday halted an effort by President Donald Trump to impose stricter new requirements on mail-in voting ahead of the midterm elections, according to the Guardian. The ruling blocked an order that would have forced states to comply with new rules on short notice, including redesigning mail-in ballot envelopes and uploading voter lists to the US Postal Service.

Election officials from both political parties had warned that implementing the changes would have been an administrative disaster, the Guardian reported, saying the requirements were not feasible to put in place before ballots began going out to voters this year.

Following the court's decision, President Trump reacted with anger on his Truth Social platform, according to the report.

Election officials across the country are now redoubling efforts to reassure Americans that mail-in voting is safe, the Guardian reported, following what it described as a push by the administration that was seen both as an attempt to change voting policy and to weaken public confidence in mail-in voting.

The Guardian did not specify further details of the Supreme Court's reasoning in its ruling as reported in the available excerpt.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…