EGEGazette
Live
Zelensky says US has ability to respond strongly after Russian ballistic missile strikes on KyivGlobal Bond Yields Hit Multi-Decade Highs as Treasury, Japanese Debt Sell OffHurricane Polo Threatens Landslides in Mexico as Storm Nolo Approaches HawaiiIranian President Presents Evidence of US Strikes on Civilians at UN AssemblyHarvey Weinstein Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 2006 Sexual AssaultHacking Group ShinyHunters Claims Major Breach Targeting FBI DataIran Won't Resume US Talks or Reopen Hormuz Until Washington Meets Its Terms, Official SaysIran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian Strikes
sportsReported

Reranking the 2024 Recruiting Class: What Scouts Got Right on Flagg and Wrong on Knueppel

A fresh look back at the 2024 high school basketball class finds Cooper Flagg still at No. 1, with some other rankings due for correction.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
ESPN

With the 2024 high school basketball recruiting class now a year removed from its original rankings, evaluators are revisiting how those projections have held up. The exercise highlights both the calls that aged well and the ones that missed the mark.

Flagg Still No. 1

Cooper Flagg remains atop the reranked list, with his college performance reinforcing the consensus that made him the top-ranked prospect in his class. His combination of two-way impact and basketball feel has continued to validate the evaluation that placed him ahead of every other player in the cycle.

Where the Rankings Missed

Not every projection held up as well. Some evaluators have acknowledged missing on players like Cooper Knueppel, whose actual role and impact diverged from where he was originally slotted, prompting a reassessment of the criteria used to rank wing and forward prospects in that class.

Recruiting rankings are inherently forward-looking guesses made before players face high-level competition, so revisiting them a year later offers a useful check on which traits translated and which didn't. Physical tools, statistical production and film evaluation all factor into initial rankings, but game reps at the next level often reveal gaps those methods miss.

As the class of 2024 continues to develop in college and professional settings, further reranking exercises are likely, with each update refining the industry's understanding of what separates a correctly projected star from a mid-list miss.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…