EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastU.S. Military Announces Four Killed in Strike on Boat in Caribbean4 killed in US military strike on suspected drug-trafficking vessel in Caribbean SeaReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanTrump Cuts Short Camp David Stay Amid Rising Middle East Tensions
scienceReported

Report Finds AI Boosts Research Tasks but Lags in Lab Experiments

A new study from Google, Google DeepMind and M.I.T. shows scientists are heavily using AI tools, though the technology has yet to significantly speed up hands-on laboratory work.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
Scientific American

A new report produced by Google, Google DeepMind and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has found that researchers across scientific disciplines are making extensive use of artificial intelligence tools in their work, according to Scientific American.

However, the report indicates that while AI is widely adopted for certain research tasks, it has not translated into comparable gains in the physical execution of laboratory experiments, Scientific American reported.

The findings suggest a gap between the areas of scientific work where AI is delivering the most benefit and the more hands-on, experimental stages of research that remain largely unaffected by the technology's advances, according to the report cited by Scientific American.

Scientific American's coverage of the report did not provide additional detail on the specific tasks or disciplines examined, or on the methodology used to reach these conclusions.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…