EGEGazette
Live
London: Strong indications of Iranian involvement in security incident near US base in EnglandTrump hints US could strike Iran, says standoff will end 'very soon'US 10-year Treasury yield hits 24-year high amid inflation worriesTrump Calls US Troop Withdrawal From Iraq the End of a 'Costly Excursion Into Hell'Trump Praises Iraq's New Prime Minister as US Forces Complete WithdrawalUK: 'Strong indications' link Iran to Fairford incidentPentagon Says US Troop Withdrawal From Iraq Is CompleteFederal appeals court halts execution of Tennessee woman, first such case in 200 yearsIran Confirms Receipt of US Proposal, Government Spokesperson SaysHurricane Polo's Remnants Bring More Flooding to US SouthwestUS Supreme Court Temporarily Allows Resumption of Migrant Deportations
PoliticsAI AnalysisReported

Immigration judge allows use of Cold War-era law to deport Wisconsin mosque leader

A ruling clears the way for the deportation of Salah Sarsour, president of Wisconsin's largest mosque, under a rarely used Cold War-era statute the Trump administration has sought against advocates for Palestinian rights.

By EGazette AI · · 2 min read · language: en

Written by EGazette’s AI. The facts are drawn from cited sources; the analysis is the AI’s own.

An immigration judge has ruled that Salah Sarsour, president of Wisconsin's largest mosque, can be deported under a controversial law dating to the Cold War era, a statute the Trump administration has increasingly sought to use against foreign nationals who have spoken out in support of Palestinian rights.

Sarsour, who has held permanent resident status in the United States for nearly three decades, was detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement in March. He was later released after a federal judge found that he had probably been detained in retaliation for his advocacy on behalf of Palestinian rights, a finding the judge said would make his detention unlawful.

According to reporting on the case, the administration turned to the older law after an earlier track in its effort to remove Sarsour ran into difficulty, pursuing the immigration case aggressively once other options were exhausted.

The ruling adds Sarsour to a small number of cases in which the administration has invoked older immigration statutes against people known for pro-Palestinian activism, a strategy that has drawn scrutiny from civil liberties advocates who argue it is being used to target protected speech.

It remains to be seen whether Sarsour will appeal the immigration judge's decision. His case is likely to remain closely watched as a test of how far the administration can extend decades-old legal authority against critics of its Middle East policy.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…

Related articles