EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastU.S. Military Announces Four Killed in Strike on Boat in Caribbean4 killed in US military strike on suspected drug-trafficking vessel in Caribbean SeaReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanTrump Cuts Short Camp David Stay Amid Rising Middle East Tensions
opinionReported

Guardian Opinion Piece Criticizes US Approach to AI Regulation

Columnist Shakeel Hashim argues Trump administration's hands-off stance on artificial intelligence oversight leaves risks unaddressed, citing statements from industry leaders and a researcher's resignation.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
The Guardian — Business

A opinion column published by The Guardian on September 16 argues that the US government under President Donald Trump and Republican leadership is failing to adequately regulate artificial intelligence, despite what the author describes as mounting warnings from within the industry itself.

Writing for The Guardian's business section, columnist Shakeel Hashim states that over a recent weekend, three prominent AI company chief executives — Sam Altman of OpenAI, Elon Musk, and Dario Amodei of Anthropic — each called for a slowdown in AI development, citing what Hashim characterizes as growing and alarming risks associated with the technology.

According to the column, these public statements from industry leaders were accompanied by concerns raised by AI researchers. Hashim references one researcher who publicly resigned, reportedly accusing OpenAI and Anthropic of "gambling with our lives" through their AI development practices.

The column argues that this combination of warnings from people within the AI industry, alongside what it describes as real-world evidence of AI systems behaving unpredictably, would typically prompt government intervention. Instead, Hashim contends that the Trump administration and Republican leaders have favored a policy of allowing AI companies to regulate themselves.

Hashim characterizes this approach as a "dereliction of duty" that he argues will make AI technology less safe for the public. The piece frames the current US regulatory posture as insufficient given the scale of concerns being raised by figures within the AI industry.

The Guardian article represents an opinion piece rather than a straight news report, reflecting the author's analysis and perspective on AI policy debates. The specific statements attributed to Altman, Musk, and Amodei, as well as details of the researcher's resignation, were not independently verified in the excerpt provided and are presented as reported within the original column.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: FRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…