EGEGazette
Live
Zelensky says US has ability to respond strongly after Russian ballistic missile strikes on KyivGlobal Bond Yields Hit Multi-Decade Highs as Treasury, Japanese Debt Sell OffHurricane Polo Threatens Landslides in Mexico as Storm Nolo Approaches HawaiiIranian President Presents Evidence of US Strikes on Civilians at UN AssemblyHarvey Weinstein Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison for 2006 Sexual AssaultHacking Group ShinyHunters Claims Major Breach Targeting FBI DataIran Won't Resume US Talks or Reopen Hormuz Until Washington Meets Its Terms, Official SaysIran Sets Conditions for United States on Possible Strait of Hormuz ReopeningTrump Warns Tehran at UN but Says Talks With Iran Are OngoingTrump Threatens to 'Annihilate' Iran's Government in UN Address as US-Iran Talks Continue on SidelinesChina's Xi Jinping Travels to US for State Visit, Summit With TrumpZelensky to Address UN General Assembly as Kyiv Reports Deadly Russian Strikes
politicsOfficialReported

Federal judge rejects White House security argument, orders press access restored

A US federal judge has dismissed national security justifications for barring CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, ordering access reinstated.

· 1 min read · language: en

A federal judge has ordered the White House to restore access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico, rejecting the administration's argument that national security concerns justified excluding the outlets.

The ruling directly addresses one of the central defenses the White House had offered for barring the three news organizations from the premises, finding that the security rationale did not hold up under judicial scrutiny.

The decision adds to a broader legal and political debate over press access to the White House, an issue that touches on longstanding norms governing how the executive branch interacts with journalists covering the presidency.

News organizations and press freedom groups have generally maintained that restricting access based on an outlet's coverage, rather than legitimate security or logistical concerns, raises serious questions about government interference with independent journalism.

The White House has not yet indicated whether it will comply immediately with the order or seek to challenge the ruling further. The case is expected to remain a point of scrutiny as it plays out in the courts.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…