EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastU.S. Military Announces Four Killed in Strike on Boat in Caribbean4 killed in US military strike on suspected drug-trafficking vessel in Caribbean SeaReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanTrump Cuts Short Camp David Stay Amid Rising Middle East Tensions
politicsReported

Class Action Lawsuit Accuses NIH of Using Keyword List to Block Grants

Researchers allege the Trump administration is using a list of 235 keywords, including 'gender' and 'racist,' to censor scientific topics from funding.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
The Guardian — World

Researchers filed a class action lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on Wednesday, alleging that the Trump administration has been blocking and cancelling scientific grants in order to censor topics with which it disagrees, according to the Guardian.

The lawsuit claims the administration has relied on a list of 235 keywords—including terms such as "gender" and "racist"—to prevent research proposals covering subjects ranging from health equity to climate change from receiving funding, the report states.

The NIH is described in the report as the world's largest public funder of biomedical research, making decisions about which studies receive federal support across a wide range of scientific and medical fields.

According to the Guardian, the plaintiffs argue that the use of the keyword list amounts to a form of censorship, restricting the scope of scientific inquiry based on subject matter rather than the scientific merit of proposed research.

The lawsuit was filed as a class action, suggesting the plaintiffs are seeking to represent a broader group of researchers who say they have been similarly affected by the grant restrictions.

Further details about the specific plaintiffs, the exact grants affected, and the NIH's response to the allegations were not included in the available reporting.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTRUR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…