EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanFederal Immigration Agent Shoots and Injures Man in Austin, TexasPowerful Explosions Reported in Syria's Aleppo CountrysideSix Pakistani soldiers, including two officers, killed in clash near Afghan borderCalls to Withdraw Secret Military Plan in Saxony-Anhalt Amid Fears of Leaks to Russia
technologyReported

Boston Ends Contract With Flock Over Alleged Nationwide Data Sharing

City officials say the surveillance technology provider left a "nationwide lookup" feature active despite a contractual requirement to disable it.

· 2 min read · language: en
Article image
Ars Technica

The city of Boston has terminated its contract with Flock, a provider of automated surveillance technology, after officials said the company shared data on a nationwide basis in violation of the terms of their agreement, according to a report by Ars Technica.

City officials said their contract with Flock required the company to disable a "nationwide lookup" function that would allow data collected in Boston to be accessed or searched from outside the city or state. Despite this contractual requirement, officials said the feature remained enabled, according to the report.

Ars Technica reported that Boston's decision to end the contract followed the city's determination that Flock had not complied with the data-sharing restrictions it had agreed to. The report did not specify the exact type of surveillance data involved or the duration for which the nationwide lookup feature was reportedly active.

Flock's response to Boston's allegations was not detailed in the available reporting. It was not immediately clear whether other municipalities with similar contracts have raised comparable concerns.

The dispute highlights ongoing scrutiny of surveillance technology vendors' data-sharing practices and the extent to which municipal contracts can effectively restrict how collected data is used or accessed once deployed.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…