EGEGazette
Live
Houthis Accuse Saudi Arabia of 28 Airstrikes in 24 Hours; U.S. Intelligence Chief Visits CairoWashington Warns Citizens of Unexpected Escalation in Middle EastIran Says Strait of Hormuz Will Stay Closed Until US Meets Its ConditionsTrump faces dual setback as U.S. courts block voting and immigration restrictionsLawsuit Filed Against Trump and His Company Over Paid Early Access Service to His PostsTrump Renews Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship Through Curbing "Birth Tourism"Trump Cuts Camp David Vacation Short Amid Middle East Escalation WarningsTrump Cuts Short Vacation, Returns to White House as US Issues "Possible Escalation" Warning in Middle EastU.S. Military Announces Four Killed in Strike on Boat in Caribbean4 killed in US military strike on suspected drug-trafficking vessel in Caribbean SeaReporters From CNN, MS NOW and Politico Denied White House Access After Trump BanTrump Cuts Short Camp David Stay Amid Rising Middle East Tensions
technologyReported

Anthropic Policy Chief Says AI Firms Cannot Rely on an 'Honor Code'

Sarah Heck, Anthropic's head of public policy, said the AI industry needs external oversight rather than self-regulation, as debate over AI safety rules intensifies.

· 1 min read · language: en
Article image
CNBC — Top News

Sarah Heck, Anthropic's head of public policy, said artificial intelligence companies cannot be expected to regulate themselves through an informal understanding, according to CNBC.

Heck offered her views on AI safety as public and regulatory debate over how to govern the development of advanced AI models continues to intensify, CNBC reported.

According to the report, Heck argued that AI companies should not be expected to operate on what she described as an "honor code," suggesting that voluntary commitments alone are insufficient to ensure safe development of the technology.

CNBC did not provide further details on specific policy proposals or additional context from Heck's remarks in the excerpt reviewed.

Anthropic, the company Heck represents, is among the major developers of large AI models and has previously spoken publicly about the need for safety standards in the industry.

The comments come amid a broader ongoing discussion among lawmakers, regulators and technology companies about the appropriate framework for overseeing AI development, though the source material does not specify which jurisdictions or legislative proposals were referenced.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Also available in: ARFRTR

Related articles

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…