Search
EGEGazette
Live
US Says It Struck Three Iranian Oil Tankers After Attacks on Its WarshipsIsrael Says It Has Seized Control of Strategic Ridge in Southern LebanonPutin Meets US Envoys to Discuss Trump Proposal to End Ukraine WarNearly 9,000 Killed in Israeli Attacks on Lebanon Since 2023, Report SaysUS Says It Struck Iranian Oil Tankers Linked to Financing of Regional ProxiesUS Says It Struck Iranian Oil Tankers Accused of Funding Regional ProxiesIRGC Claims Attacks on Oil Tankers and US-Linked Vessels Amid Hormuz StandoffUS and Iran Report Retaliatory Strikes on Ships Amid Rising TensionsUS Envoys Travel to Moscow Ahead of Ukraine War TalksIRGC Claims New Missile Strikes on US Warships Amid Strait of Hormuz StandoffIndonesia's Main Airport Suspends Flights After Anak Krakatau EruptionNepali Woman, 64, Found Alive After 10 Days in Mud-Buried Home

Analysis: Multipolar World Offers Middle Powers More Options but No Security Guarantees, Opinion Piece Argues

An opinion article published by Al Jazeera contends that groupings such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation give middle powers room to manoeuvre amid great-power rivalry, but stop short of providing collective defence.

5 Sep 2026, 3:14 PM · 2 min read · language: en
Illustrative image
Illustrative imageIllustrative photo

An opinion piece published by Al Jazeera on September 5 argues that the emergence of a multipolar world order has expanded the range of choices available to so-called middle powers, even as it leaves them without firm security guarantees.

According to the article, organisations such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) can offer states some relief from pressure exerted by larger powers competing for influence. The piece frames these blocs as useful platforms for diplomatic and economic coordination among non-aligned or middle-tier states navigating an increasingly contested international system.

However, the author states that these groupings do not extend to collective defence commitments, meaning member states cannot rely on them for mutual military protection in the way they might with formal alliance structures such as NATO.

The commentary situates this dynamic within a broader shift from a unipolar or bipolar global order toward multipolarity, in which multiple centers of power—rather than one or two dominant states—shape international affairs. The author suggests this shift creates both opportunities and risks for middle powers seeking to balance relationships with major powers while avoiding entanglement in their rivalries.

The article was published as part of Al Jazeera's opinion section, reflecting the perspective of its author rather than a straight news report.

Sources

EGazette summarizes reporting from multiple sources; follow the links for the originals.

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

Forgot password?

No account?

Loading comments…